Archive for the ‘Humans’ Category

Knighthood… or something.

Sunday, March 4th, 2012

I know myself, at least in the following way.

I can see from recent happenings that I will soon do some things which I will not understand. I’m referring to matters of chivalry. I’ve managed to gather enough details of chivalrous behavior to know how to at least imitate such character. I can identify (at least occasionally) when a gentlemen is exhibiting chivalrous behavior toward a lady. Still, for the life of my I don’t understand it.

Actually, I may be mistaken in saying that I don’t understand. From a historic eye, I can see that the ways of men and women have changed a great deal. Bringing cultural differences into the mix makes this far messier to sort. At one point, the attire of a female would have made actions such as opening doors quite difficult. In our day, daily attire does not present such problems. Perhaps formal wear would pose such a problem.

Ok, so I may be able to synthesize comprehension of garment related assistance but, one other thing leaves me quite befuddled. Why do we open car doors. These days, I know a great many females who more able-bodied than I am. I hang out with climbers and fitness ‘geeks’. Geek is a term of honor. In many cases, I have to wonder if it is thought to be insulting. I’ll explain by synthesizing another possibility. If I were in the company of a woman who was not familiar with the city or at least a traffic-rich area, I’d feel compelled to make sure that she can manage getting out of a car safely. I reckon that a woman who is under unusual circumstances (pregnancy, illness, etc.) would be afforded such treatment. However, I know women who drive a great deal faster than I do (I’m imagining that they don’t lack awareness of their surroundings). Some of them even drive stick, which in my experience requires an even greater awareness of the environment and vehicle. What then should my internal process be for these circumstances? Should I have the motive of making them feel like a lady by telling them to wait while I get the door? I can assure you that I would have thought no less of them being a lady when they were outmatching me at driving, fitness classes or even video games for that matter.

Perhaps this problem arose in me from growing up with a single mother. Perhaps it is due to the rise of women like Janna Levin, Donna Auguste, Linda Salzman, Majora Carter, Wilma Rudolph and Helen Keller. These women are not dainty little flower but, great forces among our species. The  problem could also be that I was taught that women were equal to men; this is something that I don’t recall questioning despite my habit of questioning much of what was presented to me. I would not open the car door for any of my male friends (especially Charles) unless the child safety lock was on.

Still, some instruction has been given to me so that I may perform this action. I don’t find it sufficient to fight it. However, I am willing to modify the action if the lady (whoever she may be) requests that I cease doing so for her. I haven’t a clue of what I will say if I am questioned about the effort.

Considering that we as a species predate vehicles, I don’t think that it is a matter of universal law or necessity that we follow such ordinances. Not that necessary ordinances matter much to the humans around these days.

 

On Jami Grant

Thursday, March 24th, 2011

Professor Jami Grant of University of Baltimore died today. She was instrumental in coordinating and designing the forensics major there.

Dr. Grant was one of the funniest people on campus and was always full of sunshine. She could make the even the most bitter person burst into a chuckle.

I’m usually slow to grasp the range of effect that a death can have. This has been becoming more and more real throughout the day.

 

Apologies for this Nasty Individual

Tuesday, March 8th, 2011

image

I’m not apologizing because I know or have any concern for the culprit. I’m just remarking that I would not want to be the person to clean this up. I’ve seen a salary guide for the majority of people at my job and know that janitorial staff receive crappy pay-checks, no pun intended. I need to figure out a way to pay my staff more and to convince such culprits to not perform in this way.

 

I do not know what to title this post

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

I’ve been known to be a rather liberal person during my lifetime. These days, the constant bend toward the notion of being liberal makes me feel to be somewhat of a conservative sort. I am one of those people. A fan of Proposition 8. I don’t live in Cali so I didn’t vote on the matter. I also didn’t solicit votes on the matter. I actually expected the California would be in favor of the redefinition of marriage as they were one of the first on this bandwagon. I was upset when they began to allow gay marriage over there. Though California offered a pleasant surprise, Connecticut saddened me. However, I am now beyond being upset. This guy ran off and likened this so-called injustice toward gays to the plight of African-Americans.

These issues aren’t nearly in the same functional space. First off, prohibiting liberties to someone based on their race and their sexual preference are not equal limitations. There is no person of any race who had the opportunity to be born of another race. If you disagree, find one for me; I’d enjoy meeting them. However, people can make the choice to lay down with one person or another; this is the case regardless of sexual orientation. It is now common practice to consider it unethical to oppose the so-called freedoms of homosexual. Is it not unethical to argue that this situation is the same as that of the Jewish Holocaust or African-American slavery? How about conflict diamonds? Is the prevention of gay marriage to be equated with this as well?

Lets examine equality for a moment. If you are an American and polling for equality, please acknowledge that you already live better than most people on this planet due to hideous regimes of power which occupy some other lands. Secondly, lets consider the fact that there are many homosexuals with greater far wealth than many heterosexuals. San Francisco is not the most affordable city in this country. I surely can’t afford to live there.  If we were to discuss the arts in this time period, you’d likely find more homosexuals who are knowledgeable about this topic than heteros. There are entire industries which are close to being dominated by homosexuals. This situation is not in any degree the same as that of racial injustice.

Early on, the argument was that gays should be allowed to marry because of the tax breaks or insurance allowances which are imparted upon married couples. If that be the true issue and not some cloak for some other goal… let any cooperative group be afforded the same rights.

Then it became listed as a problem of social equality. The way I hear it now is as if it were a matter of validity. The issue is now that people want to be recognized as having equal relationships to that of the rest of the population. A major factor of a hetero relationship is the means to copulate. There is also this issue of whether or not homosexuals should have the right to have children. Eggs do not await eggs and the sole goal of the sperm is to reach the egg. Do people no longer realize that they have in their bodies the means to create a generation? We are going through this crap because you don’t want to have intercourse with a member of the opposite sex? Or, because you aren’t attracted to the opposite sex?

I know of countless people who seriously do not understand their partners in heterosexual relationships. There is a theory referred to as the 80/20 rule. This theory suggests that in a relationship neither person will provide 100% of the desires of their partner but, the 80% that is given is of greater value than the 20% that is not. I’ve noticed vicariously that in both hetero and homo relationships that people will get along well for a bit and not so well for another span. Yet, this is also the case with non-romantic endeavors. Some people get along well with their bosses for a while and not so much for other periods. With my friends, I am affectionate toward them whether they are male or female, as I do intend to care for friends. This doesn’t mean that we should practice any sort of sex with each other, regardless of whether our parts fit together or not.

As a society, we have an placed a great emphasis on sex. We use it for money. People tend to free themselves for the sake of money. Does being attracted to the opposite sex require the desire to spend time in a titty bar? No. Does it require having intercourse within the first 6 months of knowing a person? No. Does it require any sexual thought toward a person? No. These are the ways that people are marketing what could otherwise be a very simple system of reproduction. Now, unfortunately the pleasure of sex has overtaken the function of sex. I suppose that someone will argue that this is my opinion.

Nobody is saying that homosexuals aren’t human. With the number of homosexuals at my job I find it difficult to believe that employment is a widespread issue. Homosexuals are not denied housing. Some have difficulty understanding that recently churches typically had a problem with acceptance of homosexuality. It is not the place of the church to accept homosexuality. The very doctrine which they follow opposes such practice… this is the case both before and after Christ (Old Testament and New Testament). If you don’t believe me, go read it for yourself. Yet, somehow homosexuals have found themselves in the pulpit. Hogwash. If it were a person who had been previously homosexual and is now reformed, it would make sense. If homosexuals are allowed, eventually prostitues will be also.